Five ways to apply startup thinking in your classroom

Nicole Kyriacou
College students sitting together working on a project
所要时间: 3 minutes

Startups are generally considered to be new, technology-focused companies that are less than five years old. For the most part, they aim to disrupt industry with innovations, grow in terms of users and revenues and provide value to customers and shareholders.

It may not appear that startups have much in common with English Language Teaching (ELT), but there is, in fact, plenty to learn from startups and the way they work.

By understanding how startups think and looking at their best attributes, we can bring more creativity to our classrooms. Not only can we find new ways for our students to learn, collaborate and grow together, but we can also help our students develop much-needed leadership and critical thinking skills.

What is startup thinking?

At its core, startup thinking is about problem-solving and growth. User-focused and data-driven, startup teams theorize, research, plan and test their products on new markets. Their strength is in their agility, being able to "pivot" quickly: change products, services and technology based on feedback from their customers.

They also operate on a number of key principles, all of which can be applied in the classroom:

1. Be entrepreneurial

Startups are entrepreneurial by definition. Their staff work in teams, but also have no problem going it alone, finding solutions and taking responsibility for new projects and initiatives. These are all excellent traits to encourage in the classroom as they will not only help your learners in an educational context, but in their professional lives too.

By learning to be accountable to themselves, measuring their own progress and seeing their achievements, autonomous learners develop self-confidence and progress faster as a result.

It’s therefore important to encourage students to take responsibility for their own learning. Rather than being solely reliant on their teacher, autonomous learners seek out ways to practice and improve their language skills in ways that appeal to them.

To do this, brainstorm strategies with your students to help them find ways to use English outside the classroom. They could, for example, keep a journal in English, watch English language films and take notes, read short stories or news articles, or even set their technology and social media language settings to English.

2. Collaborate and learn from each other

Startups have a common goal: to establish a business model and achieve a product-market fit. This goal focuses people’s attention and develops rapport among team members. As an additional benefit of working together, startuppers learn their own strengths and weaknesses and begin to collaborate with team members with complementary skills.

By learning about your students’ interests, objectives and needs, you can find inspiration to design relevant class projects. These give your students a common goal and the chance to collaborate effectively. What’s more, project work is rich in language learning opportunities and makes students accountable to one another. This in turn increases motivation and provides a genuine context for language learning.

3. Reward effort

Startups are not afraid to get things wrong. In fact, all entrepreneurs embrace mistakes, as they are part of coming to the right solution. As Thomas Edison once said "I have not failed 10,000 times – I’ve successfully found 10,000 ways that will not work." ?Some startups go as far as to reward and celebrate failure – saying that it’s a sign that a person is trying to succeed.

Encourage students to see mistakes as learning opportunities. Creating a safe space in the classroom where everyone is treated with respect and mistakes are viewed as natural learning experiences. This will help your students learn the language at their own pace, without fear of ridicule.

4. Foster a growth mindset

Startups are famous for focusing on growth and believing in improving their products. They see both negative and positive feedback as opportunities to grow. By always seeking to optimize their products and services, they improve the user experience and earn loyalty.

Similarly, it’s key to foster a growth mindset in your learners. ?A growth mindset perceives intelligence and ability as attributes to be developed, whereas a fixed mindset sees intelligence and ability as innate and unchanging.

Students with a growth mindset will therefore believe they can improve, be more motivated and see more progress as a result.

5. Mentor and support

Startup founders mentor and support their team members when they face challenges, when they need to grow and when they are not reaching their potential. This increases the value of the workforce and enables them to be more productive.

Teachers are often already naturals at this. We know how important it is to offer support to our students, especially when they are feeling frustrated or disappointed with their progress. With our encouragement and support, our students can achieve things they never thought possible. So perhaps, in this final point, startup leaders could learn a thing or two from us.

More blogs from 蜜桃app

  • 生徒たちがノートパソコンで先生の周りに立っていました

    教育における础滨の伦理的课题

    投稿者 Billie Jago
    所要时间: 5分间

    AIはあらゆる業界に革命をもたらしており、語学学習も例外ではありません。AIツールは、リアルタイムのフィードバック、即時翻訳、AI生成の文章など、前例のない形で学习者に利用機会を提供することができます。

    AIは、単に学習の成果を「示す」ために学习者が使用するのではなく、学习者の学習プロセスを強化することで、語学教育に非常に有益です。しかし、これは言うほど簡単なことではありません。AIが教室での革新的なツールであることを踏まえると、教育者が学习者の成果物の真正性を保ち、AIを活用した「不正行為」を防ぐ手助けをすることが極めて重要です。このことを踏まえると、AIの導入と学問的誠実性との間でバランスを取ることが極めて重要です。

    础滨が语学学习に与える影响

    ChatGPTやGeminiなどの生成AIツールにより、学习者はこれまで以上に簡単に文章に磨きをかけ、発展させることができるようになりました。しかし、これらのツールは、提出された文章が学习者によって作成されたものかどうか、もしそうならどの程度まで作成されているかについての懸念も引き起こします。もし学习者たちが自分の力ではなく文章生成ツールに頼るようになると、私たちが把握している学生の能力は、彼らの本当の実力を正確に反映しない可能性があります。

    もう一つの问题は、学生が自分でできるスキルに対して础滨を使い続けると、そのスキルをいずれ失ってしまったり、着しく低下してしまったりする可能性があるということです。

    これらの点は、重大な伦理的ジレンマを生み出します。

    • 础滨はどのように学习を支援するのか?それとも、(将来的に)学习プロセスそのものを置き换える可能性があるのか?
    • 教育者は、学习者の本来の能力とAIによる支援を受けた回答とを、どのように見分けることができるのか?

    础滨导入のための戦略

    教育者がAIを責任を持って取り入れる方法は数多くあり、それを学习者にも実践させることが重要です。

    1.?础滨を使って简単に解けないように课题を工夫する

    完全に础滨を使って简単に解けない「础滨耐性」のある课题を作ることはできませんが、教科书の课题を工夫したり、アクティビティから着想を得たりすることで、础滨を使って简単にこなされにくい课题にする方法はあります。

    例えば:

    • ライティング課題を、非常に地域密着した内容や文脈に特化したものに適応させます。生成AIは、特定の状況や背景に依存する内容の文章を生成するのが難しい傾向にあります。地域の課題や動向、さらには学校や教室に関連するトピックに焦点を当てます。良い例としては、学习者に現在の教室設備についてのレポートを書かせ、学習環境を改善するための提案をさせることが挙げられます。
    • 最终的な成果物ではなく、文章を书く过程に焦点を当てましょう。学生には、文章の构成を考えるためにマインドマップを使わせ、その中から実际に文章に活用したメモに印をつけさせ、文章を书き终えたあとには、自分がどのような手顺で书いたかを振り返らせるようにします。
    • マルチモーダル学習を取り入れましょう。ライティング課題の導入として、クラスでアンケート、ディベート、またはディスカッションを行い、その後に学习者に調査結果をレポート、エッセイ、記事、または他の形式でまとめさせます。
    • スキルの育成を中心に据えた課題を設計しましょう。学习者には、AIが生成した内容を批判的に分析し、そこで得たアウトプットを創造的に応用し、AI生成テキストの事実確認を通じて問題解決に取り組ませます。

    2. AIを活用して、「教育者もAIを使いこなしている」と理解させる

    所属機関の方針にもよりますが、もし教室で学习者と一緒にAIを使用できるのであれば、学习者はあなたがさまざまなAIツールやその生成内容について理解していることを認識するでしょう。効果的なアイデアとしては、クラス全体でAIに文章を生成させ、それを学生に批判的に分析させるという方法があります。例えば、「このAIが生成した文章の中で、どの部分がよくできていると思いますか?」「改善できそうな点はどこでしょうか?」「もし自分が書くとしたら、どのように違うアプローチをとりますか?」と問いかけてみましょう。

    また、教育(および他の業界)におけるAIの倫理的な影響について学习者と話し合うことで、AIに対する彼らの考えを理解し、どのような状況でAIが助けになるのか、あるいは妨げになるのかをよりよく把握することができます。

    3.? GSEの学習目標を活用して、語学能力に対する自信を育てる

    学习者は、課題への取りかかり方がわからなかったり、自分の語学能力に自信がなかったりすると、AIに頼ることがあります。こうしたことを踏まえると、学习者が自分の語学能力の現状を理解し、どこを目指して学習しているのかを明確にし、学習の成果を具体的に示すことが大切です。ここで役立つのが、GSEの学習目標です。

    Global Scale of English (GSE) は、10から90までのすべての習熟度レベルで、スキル別に詳細な目標を提供します。これらを活用すると、複雑なスキルを達成可能なステップに分割できるため、学习者は自分の語学能力を向上させるために何をする必要があるかを細かいレベルで正確に把握することができます。

    • 授業の始めにGSEの学習目標を学生と共有することで、学习者が「その日は何を学ぶのか」「その日の目標は何か」をしっかり理解することができます。授業の最後には、学习者にその日の学びを振り帰ってもらい、授業中に取り組んだことや成果物から、自分の成長を実感できるようにしましょう
    • 4つの主要なスキル(スピーキング、リスニング、リーディング、ライティング)の短期的なGSEの学習目標を設定します。それにより、学习者は自分が何に向かって取り組んでいるのかを理解し、語学力の進歩を明確に把握できるようになります。
  • A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.

    How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

    投稿者 Billie Jago
    所要时间: 4 minutes

    With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

    In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

    Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

    There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

    What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

    • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
    • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
    • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.??
    • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
    • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

    An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

    This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

    As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and?for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are?production?and?fluency, spoken interaction, language range and?accuracy.

    The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

    However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.