How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
所要时间: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.??
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and?for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are?production?and?fluency, spoken interaction, language range and?accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice? let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

More blogs from 蜜桃app

  • Children sat down on the floor reading books, with some looking up at their teacher who is sat with a book

    How to improve literacy in the classroom

    投稿者 Katharine Scott
    所要时间: 5 minutes

    Katharine Scott is a teacher trainer and educational materials developer with over 20 years’ experience writing English language textbooks. She’s co-author of the 蜜桃app Primary course - English Code and is based in Spain. Katharine outlines a number of practical ways you can help English language learners develop key literacy skills.?

    What is literacy?

    Teachers at all stages of education often complain about their students’ reading skills. The students are literate. In other words, they can interpret the graphemes, or letters on the page, into words. But they struggle to identify the purpose of a text or to analyze it in a meaningful way. We could say that the students have poor literacy skills.

    Literacy is a term used to describe an active, critical form of reading. Some of the skills of a critical reader include:

    Checking new information

    A crucial literacy skill involves discerning whether a text is factually true or not. A critical reader always checks new information against existing knowledge. As we read, we have an internal dialogue: Where does that information come from? That’s impossible because ….???

    Separating fact from opinion

    This skill is essential for understanding many different types of texts from newspaper articles to scientific research.?

    Understanding the purpose of a text

    All pieces of text have a main purpose. This may be entertainment, in the case of a story or persuasion, in the case of advertising. A critical reader will know how to identify the purpose of the text.?

    In the classroom, different types of text require different responses from the students. It’s important, as students grow older, that they know how to read and respond appropriately to a piece of written information.

    Identifying key information in a text

    This is an essential skill for summarizing information or following instructions. It is also important when we transform written information into something else, like a chart.

    In many ways, literacy is the key skill that underpins learning at all stages. This may seem like an exaggeration, but consider the importance of the four skills outlined above.

    Strategies to promote literacy

    Many teachers and parents of early learners instinctively develop literacy skills before the children can even read.?

    When we read a story out loud to a child, we often ask questions about the narrative as we turn the pages: What is going to happen next? How do you think …. feels? Why is …? ?

    These questions set the foundations for literacy.?

    Working with a reading text

    Too often, the comprehension questions that teachers ask about a text are mechanical. They ask the student to “lift” the information out of the text.

    A tale of two dragons

    "Once upon a time, there was an island in the sea. One day, people were working in the fields. The sun was shining and there was one cloud in the sky. The cloud was a strange shape and moving towards the island. Soon the cloud was very big. Then a small boy looked up."?

    Taken from English Code, Unit 4, p. 62

    Typical comprehension questions based on the text would be:

    • Where were the people working??
    • How many clouds were in the sky?

    These questions do not really reflect on the meaning of the text and do not lead to a critical analysis. While these simple questions are a good checking mechanism, they don’t help develop literacy skills.

    If we want to develop critical readers, we need to incorporate a critical analysis of reading texts into class work through a deep reading comprehension. We can organize the comprehension into three types.

    1. Text level

    Comprehension at “text level” is about exploring the meaning of individual words and phrases in a text. Examples for the text above could be:

    • Find words that show the story is a fairy tale.
    • Underline a sentence about the weather.

    Other text-level activities include:

    • Finding words in the text from a definition
    • Identifying opinions in the text
    • Finding verbs of speech
    • Finding and classifying words or phrases

    2. Between the lines

    Comprehension “between the lines” means speculating and making guesses with the information we already have from the text. This type of literacy activity often involves lots of questions and discussions with the students. You should encourage students to give good reasons for their opinions. An example for the text above could be:

    • What do you think the cloud really is?

    Other “Between the lines” activities include:

    • Discussing how characters in a story feel and why
    • Discussing characters’ motivation
    • Identifying the most important moments in a story
    • Speculating about what is going to happen next
    • Identifying possible events from fantasy events

    Literacy activities are not only based on fiction. We need to help students be critical readers of all sorts of texts. The text below is factual and informative:

    What skills do you need for ice hockey?

    "Ice hockey players should be very good skaters. They always have good balance. They change direction very quickly and they shouldn't fall over. Players should also have fast reactions because the puck moves very quickly."?

    Taken from English Code, Level 4, p. 96

    “Between the lines” activities for this text could be:

    • What equipment do you need to play ice hockey?
    • What is the purpose of this piece of text?

    3. Behind the lines

    Comprehension “behind the lines” is about the information we, the readers, already have. Our previous knowledge, our age, our social background and many other aspects change the way we understand and interpret a text.?

    An example for the text above could be:

    • What countries do you think are famous for ice hockey?

    Sometimes a lack of socio-cultural knowledge can lead to misunderstanding. Look at the text below.?

    Is the relationship between Ms Turner and Jack Roberts formal or informal?

    73 Highlands Road Oxbo, Wisconsin 54552
    April 11th

    Dear Ms. Tamer,
    Some people want to destroy the forest and build an airport. This forest is a habitat for many wolves. If they destroy the forest, the wolves will leave the forest. If the wolves leave the forest, there will be more rabbits. This won't be good for our forest.
    Please build the airport in a different place. Please don't destroy the forest.

    Kind regards, Jack Robers

    Taken from English code, Level 4, unit 5, Writing Lab

    If your students are unaware of the convention of using Dear to start a letter in English, they may not answer this question correctly.?

    Other “Behind the lines” literacy activities include:

    • Identifying the type of text
    • Imagining extra information based on the readers’ experiences?
    • Using existing knowledge to check a factual account
    • Identifying false information

    Examples:

    • What job do you think Ms Turner has?
    • Do you think Jack lives in a village or a city?
    • Do wolves live in forests?

    Literacy is more than reading

    From the activities above, it’s clear that a literacy scheme develops more than reading skills. As students speculate and give their opinions, they talk and listen to each other.?

    A literacy scheme can also develop writing skills. The text analysis gives students a model to follow in their writing. In addition, a literacy scheme works on higher-order thinking skills such as analysis, deduction and summary.

    Developing literacy skills so that students become active, critical readers should be a key part of educational programs at all ages. Literacy activities based on a reading text can be especially useful for the foreign language class.?

    With literacy activities, we can encourage students:

    • To use the text as a springboard for communicating ideas and opinions
    • To analyze the text as a model for writing activities
    • To see how language is used in context
    • To explore the meanings of words

    More crucially, we are developing critical readers for the future.

  • 座った生徒の隣に立っているティーハーは、ペンを持っていて、テーブルの上の彼女の作品を身振りで示しています。左にはピンクの GSE アンバサダーのロゴ。

    骋厂贰によるリスニングスキルの评価

    投稿者
    所要时间: 4分间

    相互接続された今日の世界では、 英語 での効果的なコミュニケーションがこれまで以上に重要になっています。教育者や言語学习者が 英語 習熟度を測定し、向上させようとする中で、 Global Scale of English (GSE) のようなリソースは評価のための貴重なフレームワークを提供します。このブログ記事では、 GSE を使用してリスニングスキルを評価する方法を探り、指導の調整と言語開発のサポートにどのように役立つかについての洞察を提供します。

    リスニングスキルについては、この GSE 、学习者がさまざまな文脈で話し言葉 英語 をどれだけ理解できるかに焦点を当てています。これは、さまざまな複雑さのレベルで理解度を評価します。

    简単な情报を理解する: 低いレベルでは、学习者は簡単な指示や日常的なトピックなどの基本的な情報を理解することが期待されます。この GSE は、学习者が重要な詳細をどれだけうまく把握できるかについての 学习目标 を提供します。

    主要なアイデアを理解する: 習熟度が上がるにつれて、学习者は会話や放送など、より複雑な話し言葉のテキストで主要なアイデアと重要なポイントを特定できるはずです。この GSE では、学习者がさまざまなソースから重要な情報をどれだけうまく抽出できるかを概説しています。

    详细な情报を理解する:上級レベルでは、学习者は暗黙の意味や話し手の意図など、詳細で微妙な情報を理解することが期待されます。この GSE では、これらの段階で必要な詳細度と理解の深さについて説明しています。

    また、この GSE では、グローバルな理解、情報の認識、特定の情報の識別、情報の抽出など、生徒がリスニングのさまざまな操作にどのように取り組んでいるかを示しています。これを考慮に入れることで、教師は生徒の進捗状況を監視し、リスニングスキルを評価できます。これを実際に実行する例を挙げます。

    たとえば、 GSE 30-35 ( CEFRの A2 が低いレベルに相当) を考え、学生が情報をどのように処理するかに焦点を当ててみましょう。リスニング活動をチェックするとき、単に答えが正しいか間違っているかに焦点を当てるのではなく、 GSE を使用して学习者を分析し、彼らがどのような進歩を遂げているか、そして彼らが前進するために教師として何をする必要があるかを確認できます。方法は次のとおりです。

  • ペンを手にしたオープンノートパソコンを見つめ、ノートパソコンに向かって微笑む男性

    新しい言语を学ぶことに関する7つの神话が暴かれた

    投稿者
    所要时间: 3分间

    新しい言語を学ぶことは、新しい文化への扉を開き、キャリアの機会を増やし、認知的なメリットを提供するなど、非常にやりがいのある経験になる可能性があります。しかし、言語学習に関する多くの神話は、潜在的な学习者を落胆させたり、迷わせたりする可能性があります。 Today、私たちはあなたの言語の旅を助けるために、7つの一般的な言語学習の神話を暴いています。

    俗説1:「流畅に话せるようになるには、若くして始める必要がある」

    真実:

    新しい言语を学ぶのに遅すぎることはありません。子供はアクセントやイントネーションをより简単に习得できるかもしれませんが、大人は多くの场合、复雑な文法や语汇を理解するのに役立つ、より発达した认知スキルと人生経験の利点を持っています。多くの研究は、大人が献身と适切な学习戦略で流畅さを达成できることを示しています。

    神话2:「言语を学ぶには、その国に住まなければならない」

    真実:

    テクノロジーのおかげで、家を出ることなく新しい言语に没头することができます。语学学习アプリ、オンラインコース、バーチャルチューター、さらにはソーシャルメディアなどのツールは、练习と没头のための十分な机会を提供できます。その言语が话されている国に住むことは有益ですが、それは必须ではありません。

    神话3:「言语を学ぶには、生まれつきの才能がなければならない」

    真実:

    言語学習 、生まれつきの才能よりも、一貫した練習と効果的な方法が重要です。正しい考え方とリソースがあれば、誰でも新しい言語を学ぶことができます。粘り強さ、モチベーション、さまざまな学習手法を使用することで、学習能力を大幅に向上させることができます。

    神话4:「语汇を暗记することがすべて」

    真実:

    语汇力は不可欠ですが、言语学习には暗记以上のものが含まれます。文法を理解すること、话すことと闻くことの练习、文化的なニュアンスを感じることも同様に重要です。会话をしたり、その言语で読んだり书いたりすることで、学习プロセスをより包括的で楽しいものにすることができます。

    神话5:「一度に复数の言语を学ぶことはできない」

    真実:

    复数の言语を同时に学ぶことは可能ですが、慎重な计画と整理が必要です。重要なのは、时间を効果的に管理し、自分を圧倒しないようにすることです。言语ごとに异なる方法やツールを使用すると、头の中でそれらを区别するのに役立ちます。

    俗説6:「映画を见たり音楽を聴いたりすることは、学习とは见なされない」

    真実:

    ターゲット言语でメディアを消费することは、リスニングスキルと文化的理解を向上させる优れた方法です。映画、テレビ番组、音楽、ポッドキャストでは、教科书では取り上げられないような自然言语の使用、スラング、口语表现に触れることができます。これは、より正式な学习を补完する楽しく魅力的な方法です。

    俗説7:「完璧に话せないなら、やるな」

    真実:

    完璧主義は、言語学習の大きな障壁となる可能性があります。間違いを犯すことは、学習プロセスの自然な部分です。スピーキングの練習をすればするほど、自信がつき、上達します。完璧さよりもコミュニケーション Focus 、ミスを恐れないでください。

    结论

    これらの神话を覆すことで、より多くの人々が新しい言语を学ぶことに挑戦するきっかけになればと考えています。最も重要な要素は、一贯性、练习、そして失败から学ぶ意欲であることを忘れないでください。

    新しい言语に取り组む準备はできましたか?今日から始めて、多言语であることに伴う无限の可能性に没头してください。私たちの投稿「バイリンガルであることは、脳を良好な状态に保つのに役立ちます」で利点を探ります。