How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
所要时间: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.??
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and?for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are?production?and?fluency, spoken interaction, language range and?accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice?– let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

Learn more about the GSE

More blogs from 蜜桃app

  • 先生がクラスの前に立って、彼女のクラスと話していました

    エンプロイアビリティの英语:一般英语を教えるだけでは不十分な理由

    投稿者 Ehsan Gorji
    所要时间: 4分间

    多くの 英語 言語学习者は、自分の職業に必要な言語の核心に迫ることを目的として 英語 を勉強しています。学习者がエンジニア、弁護士、乳母、看護師、警察官、料理人、販売員のいずれであっても、一般的な 英語 を教えるだけでなく、特定の目的のために 英語 を教えるだけでは十分ではありません。私たちは、エンプロイアビリティのために学习者のスキルを向上させる必要があります。

    会话の4つの格言

    言语の哲学者であるポール?グライスは、彼の记事 「论理と会话」で、すべての会话は量、质、関係、方法の4つの格言に基づいていると提案しています。彼は、これらの格言がうまく组み合わされば、最高の会话が行われ、适切なメッセージが适切な人に适切なタイミングで届けられると信じています。

    この4つの格言は、物事がよりフォーマルで紧急性の高いことが多い职场では、より深い意味を持つようになります。多くの人事(贬搁)マネージャーは、求职者や従业员が职务に必要な英语言语のレベルまで十分な教育を受けていないために、职场での会话を微调整するのに何时间も费やしています。これに加えて、世界中の多くの公司が英语を公司の公式言语として採用しているという事実が相まって、ビジネスの世界では英语言语の习得という新たな要件が生まれました。

    従業員が求人を理由に断られたり、しばらくして失格になったりするのは満足のいくものではありません。または、彼らの 英語 言語プロファイルが仕事が完全に期待していることと相関していないか、仕事の役割に必要な必須の能力さえ持っていないため、割り当てられたタスクを実行できません。

    骋厂贰ジョブプロファイルがどのように役立つか

    のジョブプロファイルは、さまざまな職務に関連する「必須のやること」をターゲットにするのに役立ちます。「学习者を選択」ドロップダウンメニューでは、4つの学习者タイプ(この場合は「プロフェッショナル学习者」を選択)のGSE学習目標を表示することができます。次に、「職務を選択」ボタンをクリックして、特定の職務に固有の目標を絞り込むことができます - たとえば、「オフィスおよび管理サポート」、次に「ホテル、モーテル、リゾートのデスククラーク」。

    次に、結果に適用するGSE/CEFR範囲を選択できます。この例では、ホテルのデスク係がB1-B1+/GSE: 43-58で習得することが期待される英語言語スキルを知りたいです。