Dilbilgisi: asi canavar nasıl evcilleştirilir

Küçük bir çocuk sınıfta bir masaya oturmuÅŸ yazı yazıyordu

"Kralları bile nasıl kontrol edeceÄŸini bilen dilbilgisi"Ìý- ²Ñ´Ç±ô¾±Ã¨°ù±ð

Dilbilgisini düşündüğünüzde, "kural" muhtemelen aklınıza gelen ilk kelimedir. Kuşkusuz, geleneksel dilbilgisi görüşü, bunun "dil kuralları" ile ilgili olduğu yönündedir. Aslında, çok uzun zaman önce, bir dil öğretmek sadece gramer kurallarını ve belki de birkaç kelime listesini öğretmek anlamına geliyordu. Ancak, aslında gramer kuralı diye bir şey olmadığını öne süreceğim.

Ne demek istediğimi göstermek için, sıfatların karşılaştırmasını ele alalım: "daha büyük", "daha küçük", "daha kullanışlı", "daha ilginç" vb. Basit bir kuralla başlayabiliriz: tek heceli sıfatlar için -er ekleyin ve iki veya daha fazla heceli sıfatlar için daha fazla + sıfat kullanın.

Ancak bu pek işe yaramıyor: evet, "daha kullanışlı" diyoruz ama aynı zamanda "daha akıllı" ve "daha güzel" de diyoruz. Tamam o zaman, kuralı değiştirdiğimizi varsayalım. Diyelim ki -y veya -er ile biten iki heceli sıfatlar için -er ekliyorsunuz.

Ne yazık ki, bu da pek işe yaramıyor: "daha akıllı" diyoruz, ama aynı zamanda "daha ayık" ve "daha uygun" diyoruz. Ve bazı tek heceli sıfatlarla ilgili sorunlar da var: "daha gerçek" veya "daha " yerine "daha gerçek" ve "daha bütün" diyoruz. Kuralı bu istisnalara uyacak şekilde değiştirirsek, yarım sayfa uzunluğunda olacak ve her neyse, aramaya devam edersek daha fazla istisna bulacağız. Bu, İngilizce dilbilgisinde tekrar tekrar olur. Çoğu zaman, kurallar o kadar istisnalarla dolu görünür ki, o kadar da yardımcı olmazlar.

Ve "kural yaklaşımı" ile ilgili başka bir büyük sorun daha var: sıfatların karşılaştırılması kadar açık bir şeyde bile yapının gerçekte ne için kullanıldığını söylemiyor. Bir şeyleri karşılaştırmak için kullanıldığını varsayabilirsiniz: "Benim evim Mary'ninkinden daha küçük"; "John, Stephen'dan daha çekici". Ama şuna bakın: "Ne kadar çok çalışırsanız, o kadar çok para kazanırsınız." Ya da şu: "Londra giderek daha kalabalık hale geliyor." Her iki cümle de karşılaştırmalı sıfatlar kullanır, ancak iki şeyi doğrudan karşılaştırmazlar.

Aslında burada baktığımız şey bir kural değil, doğru teknik terimi kullanmak için birkaç örtüşen model veya paradigmadır:

  1. sıfat + -er + daha
  2. daha fazla + sıfat + daha fazla
  3. Paralel Karşılaştırmalı Sıfatlar: + Karşılaştırmalı Sıfat 1 ... + Karşılaştırmalı sıfat 2
  4. Tekrarlanan karşılaştırmalı sıfat: sıfat + -er + ve + sıfat + -er/daha fazla ve daha fazla + sıfat

Bu resim daha doğru, ancak soyut ve teknik görünüyor. Bugünlerde gerçekte öğrettiklerimizden ve öğrenme hedefleri ve ölçülebilir sonuçlar etrafında organize olma eğiliminde olan öğretme şeklimizden çok uzaktır, örneğin: "Bu dersin (veya modülün) sonunda öğrencilerim kendi eşyalarını başkasının eşyalarıyla karşılaştırabilmelidir". Yani öğrencilerimize bir kuralı ezberlemeyi ve hatta bir kalıbı manipüle etmeyi öğretmiyoruz; Onlara gerçek dünyada bir şeyler yapmayı öğretiyoruz. Ve tabii ki, bunu öğrencinin seviyesine uygun bir seviyede öğretiyoruz.

Dilbilgisine geri dönersek, genel dersimizi veya modül hedefimizi belirledikten sonra, bilmemiz gereken bazı şeyler şunlardır.

  • Bu amacı ifade etmek için hangi gramer biçimleri (kalıpları) kullanılabilir?
  • Hangileri öğrencilerimin seviyesine uygun? Zaten bilmeleri gereken bazı ÅŸeyler var mı, yoksa onlara bu derste öğretmeli miyim?
  • Formlar pratikte nasıl görünüyor? Bazı iyi örnekler neler olabilir?

Mevcut dilbilgisi ders kitapları genellikle tüm bu bilgileri sağlamaz; Özellikle, seviye konusunda çok belirsizdirler. Çoğu zaman dilbilgisi yapılarını belirli CEFR seviyelerine değil, örneğin A1/A2 veya A2/B1 gibi bir aralığa koyarlar ve hiçbiri dilbilgisini genel öğrenme hedefleriyle tam olarak bütünleştirmez.

ÃÛÌÒapp'da, İngilizce öğretmenler ve öğrenciler için aÅŸağıdaki özelliklere sahip yeni bir dilbilgisi kaynağı türü geliÅŸtirerek bu sorunları ele alma hedefini kendimize belirledik:

  • Öğrenen yeterliliÄŸini geliÅŸtirmenin kesin derecelendirmesi ile Global Scale of English dayanmaktadır
  • Avrupa Konseyi dil müfredatları üzerine inÅŸa edilmiÅŸtir ve grameri CEFR seviyeye ve dil iÅŸlevlerine baÄŸlar
  • Yapıları gözden geçirmek ve seviyelerini deÄŸerlendirmek için uluslararası dil uzmanlarından oluÅŸan ekipleri kullanır

Dilbilgisini GSE Teacher Toolkit'e dahil ediyoruz ve bunu şu amaçlarla kullanabilirsiniz:

  • Dilbilgisi yapılarını GSE veya CEFR düzeyine göre arayın
  • Dilbilgisi yapılarını anahtar kelimeye veya dilbilgisi kategorisine/konuÅŸmanın bölümüne göre arayın
  • Belirli bir dilbilgisi yapısının hangi seviyede öğretilmesi gerektiÄŸini öğrenin
  • Hangi dilbilgisi yapılarının belirli bir öğrenme hedefini desteklediÄŸini öğrenin
  • Hangi öğrenme hedeflerinin belirli bir dilbilgisi yapısıyla iliÅŸkili olduÄŸunu öğrenin
  • Herhangi bir dilbilgisi yapısı için örnekler alın
  • Dilbilgisi yapılarının çoÄŸu için ücretsiz öğretim materyalleri edinin

Bunu, İngilizce öğreten ve müfredat tasarlayan herkes için açık erişimli bir kaynak olarak düşünün.

ÃÛÌÒapp'dan daha fazla blog

  • A group of students stood around a teacher on a laptop

    The ethical challenges of AI in education

    By Billie Jago
    Okuma zamanı: 5 minutes

    AI is revolutionising every industry, and language learning is no exception. AI tools can provide students with unprecedented access to things like real-time feedback, instant translation and AI-generated texts, to name but a few.

    AI can be highly beneficial to language education by enhancing our students’ process of learning, rather than simply being used by students to ‘demonstrate’ a product of learning. However, this is easier said than done, and given that AI is an innovative tool in the classroom, it is crucial that educators help students to maintain authenticity in their work and prevent AI-assisted ‘cheating’. With this in mind, striking a balance between AI integration and academic integrity is critical.

    How AI impacts language learning

    Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini have made it easier than ever for students to refine and develop their writing. However, these tools also raise concerns about whether submitted texts are student-produced, and if so, to what extent. If students rely on text generation tools instead of their own skills, our understanding of our students’ abilities may not reflect their true proficiency.

    Another issue is that if students continue to use AI for a skill they are capable of doing on their own, they’re likely to eventually lose that skill or become significantly worse at it.

    These points create a significant ethical dilemma:

    • How does AI support learning, or does it (have the potential to) replace the learning process?
    • How can educators differentiate between genuine student ability and AI-assisted responses?

    AI-integration strategies

    There are many ways in which educators can integrate AI responsibly, while encouraging our learners to do so too.

    1.ÌýRedesign tasks to make them more ‘AI-resistant’

    No task can be completely ‘AI-resistant’, but there are ways in which teachers can adapt coursebook tasks or take inspiration from activities in order to make them less susceptible to being completed using AI.

    For example:

    • Adapt writing tasks to be hyperlocal or context-specific. Generative AI is less likely to be able to generate texts that are context-bound. Focus on local issues and developments, as well as school or classroom-related topics. A great example is having students write a report on current facilities in their classroom and suggestions for improving the learning environment.
    • Focus on the process of writing rather than the final product. Have students use mind maps to make plans for their writing, have them highlight notes from this that they use in their text and then reflect on the steps they took once they’ve written their piece.
    • Use multimodal learning. Begin a writing task with a class survey, debate or discussion, then have students write up their findings into a report, essay, article or other task type.
    • Design tasks with skill-building at the core. Have students use their critical thinking skills to analyse what AI produces, creatively adapt its output and problem solve by fact-checking AI-generated text.

    2.ÌýUse AI so that students understand you know how to use it

    Depending on the policies in your institution, if you can use AI in the classroom with your students, they will see that you know about different AI tools and their output. A useful idea is to generate a text as a class, and have students critically analyse the AI-generated text. What do they think was done well? What could be improved? What would they have done differently?

    You can also discuss the ethical implications of AI in education (and other industries) with your students, to understand their view on it and better see in what situations they might see AI as a help or a hindrance.

    3.ÌýUse the GSE Learning Objectives to build confidence in language abilities

    Sometimes, students might turn to AI if they don’t know where to start with a task or lack confidence in their language abilities. With this in mind, it’s important to help your students understand where their language abilities are and what they’re working towards, with tangible evidence of learning. This is where the GSE Learning Objectives can help.

    The Global Scale of English (GSE) provides detailed, skill-specific objectives at every proficiency level, from 10 to 90. These can be used to break down complex skills into achievable steps, allowing students to see exactly what they need to do to improve their language abilities at a granular level.

    • Start by sharing the GSE Learning Objectives with students at the start of class to ensure they know what the expectations and language goals are for the lesson. At the end of the lesson, you can then have students reflect on their learning and find evidence of their achievement through their in-class work and what they’ve produced or demonstrated.
    • Set short-term GSE Learning Objectives for the four key skills – speaking, listening, reading and writing. That way, students will know what they’re working towards and have a clear idea of their language progression.
  • A teacher stood by a long wooden desk where her students are sat smiling at her

    What’s it like to teach English in France?

    By
    Okuma zamanı: 3 minutes

    Kirsty Murray taught English for a year at a collège (the French equivalent of a secondary school) in Villers-Cotterêts: a town in the north of France known for being the birthplace of Alexandre Dumas. She taught mixed-ability groups of 11- to 16-year-olds, with classes ranging in size from 10 to 35 students. Here, she shares the five lessons she learned from the experience.

  • A teacher helping a teenage student working at her desk in a library

    How teachers can use the GSE for professional development

    By
    Okuma zamanı: 4.5 minutes

    As English teachers, we’re usually the ones helping others grow. We guide learners through challenges, celebrate their progress and push them to reach new heights. But what about our own growth? How do we, as educators, continue to develop and refine our practice?

    The Global Scale of English (GSE) is often seen as a tool for assessing students. However, in my experience, it can also be a powerful guide for teachers who want to become more intentional, reflective, and confident in their teaching. Here's how the GSE has helped me in my own journey as an English teacher and how it can support yours too.

    About the GSE

    The GSE is a proficiency scale developed by ÃÛÌÒapp. It measures English ability across four skills – listening, speaking, reading and writing – on a scale from 10 to 90. It’s aligned with the CEFR but offers more detailed learning objectives, which can be incredibly useful in diverse teaching contexts.

    I first encountered the GSE while exploring ways to better personalize learning objectives in my Business English classes. As a teacher in a non-formal education setting in Indonesia, I often work with students who don’t fit neatly into one CEFR level. I needed something more precise, more flexible, and more connected to real classroom practice. That’s when the GSE became a turning point.

    Reflecting on our teaching practice

    The GSE helped me pause and reflect. I started reading through the learning objectives and asking myself important questions. Were my lessons really aligned with what learners at this level needed? Was I challenging them just enough or too much?

    By using the GSE as a mirror, I began to see areas where I could improve. For example, I realized that, although I was confident teaching speaking skills, I wasn’t always giving enough attention to writing development. The GSE didn’t judge me. It simply showed me where I could grow.

    Planning with purpose

    One of the best things about the GSE is that it brings clarity to lesson planning. Instead of guessing whether an activity is suitable for a student’s level, I now check the GSE objectives. If I know a learner is at GSE 50 in speaking, I can design a role-play that matches that level of complexity. If another learner is at GSE 60, I can challenge them with more open-ended tasks.

    Planning becomes easier and more purposeful. I don’t just create lessons, I design learning experiences that truly meet students where they are.

    Collaborating with other teachers

    The GSE has also become a shared language for collaboration. When I run workshops or peer mentoring sessions, I often invite teachers to explore the GSE Toolkit together. We look at learning objectives, discuss how they apply to our learners, and brainstorm ways to adapt materials.

    These sessions are not just about theory: they’re energizing. Teachers leave with new ideas, renewed motivation and a clearer sense of how to bring their teaching to the next level.

    Getting started with the GSE

    If you’re curious about how to start using the GSE for your own growth, here are a few simple steps:

    • Visit the GSE Teacher Toolkit and explore the learning objectives for the skills and levels you teach.
    • Choose one or two objectives that resonate with you and reflect on whether your current lessons address them.
    • Try adapting a familiar activity to better align with a specific GSE range.
    • Use the GSE when planning peer observations or professional learning communities. It gives your discussions a clear focus.

    Case study from my classroom

    I once had a private Business English student preparing for a job interview. Her speaking skills were solid – around GSE 55 – but her writing was more limited, probably around GSE 45. Instead of giving her the same tasks across both skills, I personalized the lesson.

    For speaking, we practiced mock interviews using complex questions. For writing, I supported her with guided sentence frames for email writing. By targeting her actual levels, not just a general CEFR level, she improved faster and felt more confident.

    That experience reminded me that when we teach with clarity, learners respond with progress.

    Challenges and solutions

    Of course, using the GSE can feel overwhelming at first. There are many descriptors, and it can take time to get familiar with the scale. My advice is to start small: focus on one skill or one level. Also, use the Toolkit as a companion, not a checklist.

    Another challenge is integrating the GSE into existing materials, and this is where technology can help. I often use AI tools like ChatGPT to adjust or rewrite tasks so they better match specific GSE levels. This saves time and makes differentiation easier.

    Teachers deserve development too

    Teaching is a lifelong journey. The GSE doesn’t just support our students, it also supports us. It helps us reflect, plan, and collaborate more meaningfully. Most of all, it reminds us that our growth as teachers is just as important as the progress of our learners.

    If you’re looking for a simple, practical, and inspiring way to guide your professional development, give the GSE a try. It helped me grow, and I believe it can help you too.

    Additional resources