Grammar: how to tame the unruly beast

Simon Buckland
A young child sat at a desk in a classroom writing

“Grammar, which knows how to control even kings”- ѴDZè

When you think of grammar, “rule” is probably the first word that pops into your mind. Certainly the traditional view of grammar is that it’s about the “rules of language”. Indeed, not so long ago, teaching a language meant just teaching grammatical rules, plus perhaps a few vocabulary lists. However, I’m going to suggest that there’s actually no such thing as a grammatical rule.

To show you what I mean, let’s take the comparative of adjectives: “bigger”, “smaller”, “more useful”, “more interesting”, etc. We might start with a simple rule: for adjectives with one syllable, add -er, and for adjectives with two or more syllables, use more + adjective.

But this doesn’t quite work: yes, we say “more useful”, but we also say “cleverer”, and “prettier”. OK then, suppose we modify the rule. Let’s also say that for two-syllable adjectives ending in -y or -er you add -er.

Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite work either: we do say “cleverer”, but we also say “more sober” and “more proper”. And there are problems with some of the one-syllable adjectives too: we say “more real” and “more whole” rather than “realer” or “wholer”. If we modify the rule to fit these exceptions, it will be half a page long, and anyway, if we keep looking we’ll find yet more exceptions. This happens repeatedly in English grammar. Very often, rules seem so full of exceptions that they’re just not all that helpful.

And there’s another big problem with the “rule approach”: it doesn’t tell you what the structure is actually used for, even with something as obvious as the comparative of adjectives. You might assume that it’s used for comparing things: “My house is smaller than Mary’s”; “John is more attractive than Stephen”. But look at this: “The harder you work, the more money you make.” Or this: “London is getting more and more crowded.” Both sentences use comparative adjectives, but they’re not directly comparing two things.

What we’re actually looking at here is not a rule but several overlapping patterns, or paradigms to use the correct technical term:

  1. adjective + -er + than
  2. more + adjective + than
  3. parallel comparative adjectives: the + comparative adjective 1 … the + comparative adjective 2
  4. repeated comparative adjective: adjective + -er + and + adjective + -er/more and more + adjective

This picture is more accurate, but it looks abstract and technical. It’s a long way from what we actually teach these days and the way we teach it, which tends to be organized around learning objectives and measurable outcomes, such as: “By the end of this lesson (or module) my students should be able to compare their own possessions with someone else’s possessions”. So we’re not teaching our students to memorize a rule or even to manipulate a pattern; we’re teaching them to actually do something in the real world. And, of course, we’re teaching it at a level appropriate for the student’s level.

So, to come back to grammar, once we’ve established our overall lesson or module objective, here are some of the things we’re going to need to know.

  • What grammatical forms (patterns) can be used to express this objective?
  • Which ones are appropriate for the level of my students? Are there some that they should already know, or should I teach them in this lesson?
  • What do the forms look like in practice? What would be some good examples?

Existing grammar textbooks generally don’t provide all this information; in particular, they’re very vague about level. Often they don’t even put grammar structures into specific CEFR levels but into a range, e.g. A1/A2 or A2/B1, and none fully integrates grammar with overall learning objectives.

At app, we’ve set ourselves the goal of addressing these issues by developing a new type of grammar resource for English teachers and learners that:

  • Is based on the Global Scale of English with its precise gradation of developing learner proficiency
  • Is built on the Council of Europe language syllabuses, linking grammar to CEFR level and to language functions
  • Uses international teams of language experts to review the structures and assess their levels

We include grammar in the GSE Teacher Toolkit, and you can use it to:

  • Search for grammar structures either by GSE or CEFR level
  • Search for grammar structures by keyword or grammatical category/part of speech
  • Find out at which level a given grammar structure should be taught
  • Find out which grammar structures support a given learning objective
  • Find out which learning objectives are related to a given grammar structure
  • Get examples for any given grammar structure
  • Get free teaching materials for many of the grammar structures

Think of it as an open-access resource for anyone teaching English and designing a curriculum.

More blogs from app

  • Business people sat at a table with papers smiling together

    Improve your strategic workforce planning with English language testing

    By Samantha Ball
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    Companies constantly seek methods to optimize workforce productivity and effectiveness. A powerful approach to achieving this goal is through strategic workforce planning bolstered by English language testing. This tactic not only identifies and addresses skills gaps but also reduces attrition and strengthens your workforce for both short-term and long-term success.

  • A teacher standing in front of others with a tablet smiling

    Teachers’ FAQs about the new CASAS STEPS

    By app Languages
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Back in July 2024, the CASAS test was updated to become the CASAS STEPS (Student Test of English Progress and Success). In our previous blog posts, we discussed some of the reasons for the change,we covered acronyms every Adult ESOL teacher should learn, and this week we are answering frequently asked questions regarding the new assessment.

    1. What is the timeline for the CASAS STEPS implementation?

    The new test has been available since 2023 and was fully implemented nationwide on July 1, 2024. The CASAS STEPS is approved by OCTAE for NRS reporting through July 2030.

    2. How is the STEPS series different from the previous series?

    The CASAS STEPS assessments contain more rigorous questions and provide shorter testing times. Both Reading and Listening STEPS now have five levels, measuring academic vocabulary and higher-order thinking skills contained in the ELP Standards. Note that the test form numbers have also changed, ranging from 621R-630R and 621L-630L.

    3. What is the STEPS scale score range in relation to NRS levels?

    The new test levels are A-E, with two alternate forms for each level. The STEPS levels correspond to NRS levels 1-6. Each STEPS level overlaps with two - and only two - NRS levels, so there is no chance of a level 1 (beginning ESL literacy) student accidentally testing into a level 5 (high intermediate) class.

    4. How many questions are there and how long is each test?

    Reading: Locator (15 minutes); Level A (33 items, 30 minutes); Level B (36 items, 50 minutes); Levels C-E: (36 items, 75 minutes).
    Listening: Locator (15 minutes); Level A (33 items, 28 minutes); Level B (36 items, 45 minutes); Level C (39 items, 52 minutes); Level D (39 items, 56 minutes); Level E (39 items, 38 minutes).

    5. Can we pretest with the Life and Work series while transitioning to the STEPS series?

    No, agencies cannot pretest students on the Life and Work series and post-test on the STEPS series. It is essential that pre- and post-testing always occurs within the same series to ensure test reliability and validity.

    6. What are the STEPS competency areas?

    Basic communication, consumer economics, community resources, health, employment, and government and law (new for test levels D and E).

    7. What task areas does each test contain?

    The Reading STEPS contains four task areas: 1. Forms; 2. Charts, tables, and graphs; 3. Texts, emails, articles, and narratives; 4. Signs, ads, and labels. The following ELPS skills are assessed: vocabulary, details, main idea, inference, point of view, and supporting evidence.

    The Listening STEPS contains five task areas: vocabulary, details, dialogue, main idea, and summary. The following ELPS skills are assessed: retell key details, continue conversation, identify the main topic, and summarize.

    8. How can I prepare my students for the new test?

    app offers a wide selection of educational material to prepare you and your students for the new CASAS STEPS. Our FUTURE series is completely aligned with the new test format, with lesson prep tips, notes and examples for teachers, templates, study guides, test overviews, printed and digital test practices, answer sheets, and the integrated online platform MyEnglishLab.

    What other questions do you have?

    Click here to download a printable version of the charts and tables, to browse our textbook selection, including our FUTURE Series. If your program is not yet using the series, or if you’d like tutorials and tips as a current user,click here. Follow along onand share this post with your fellow teachers and administrators.

  • A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.

    How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

    By Billie Jago
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

    In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

    Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

    There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

    What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

    • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
    • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
    • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.
    • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
    • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

    An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

    This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

    As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (andfor the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these areproductionandfluency, spoken interaction, language range andaccuracy.

    The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

    However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.