Can computers really mark exams? Benefits of ELT automated assessments

app Languages
Hands typing at a laptop with symbols

Automated assessment, including the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), is one of the latest education tech solutions. It speeds up exam marking times, removes human biases, and is as accurate and at least as reliable as human examiners. As innovations go, this one is a real game-changer for teachers and students. 

However, it has understandably been met with many questions and sometimes skepticism in the ELT community – can computers really mark speaking and writing exams accurately? 

The answer is a resounding yes. Students from all parts of the world already take AI-graded tests.  aԻ Versanttests – for example – provide unbiased, fair and fast automated scoring for speaking and writing exams – irrespective of where the test takers live, or what their accent or gender is. 

This article will explain the main processes involved in AI automated scoring and make the point that AI technologies are built on the foundations of consistent expert human judgments. So, let’s clear up the confusion around automated scoring and AI and look into how it can help teachers and students alike. 

AI versus traditional automated scoring

First of all, let’s distinguish between traditional automated scoring and AI. When we talk about automated scoring, generally, we mean scoring items that are either multiple-choice or cloze items. You may have to reorder sentences, choose from a drop-down list, insert a missing word- that sort of thing. These question types are designed to test particular skills and automated scoring ensures that they can be marked quickly and accurately every time.

While automatically scored items like these can be used to assess receptive skills such as listening and reading comprehension, they cannot mark the productive skills of writing and speaking. Every student's response in writing and speaking items will be different, so how can computers mark them?

This is where AI comes in. 

We hear a lot about how AI is increasingly being used in areas where there is a need to deal with large amounts of unstructured data, effectively and 100% accurately – like in medical diagnostics, for example. In language testing, AI uses specialized computer software to grade written and oral tests. 

How AI is used to score speaking exams

The first step is to build an acoustic model for each language that can recognize speech and convert it into waveforms and text. While this technology used to be very unusual, most of our smartphones can do this now. 

These acoustic models are then trained to score every single prompt or item on a test. We do this by using human expert raters to score the items first, using double marking. They score hundreds of oral responses for each item, and these ‘Standards’ are then used to train the engine. 

Next, we validate the trained engine by feeding in many more human-marked items, and check that the machine scores are very highly correlated to the human scores. If this doesn’t happen for any item, we remove it, as it must match the standard set by human markers. We expect a correlation of between .95-.99. That means that tests will be marked between 95-99% exactly the same as human-marked samples. 

This is incredibly high compared to the reliability of human-marked speaking tests. In essence, we use a group of highly expert human raters to train the AI engine, and then their standard is replicated time after time.  

How AI is used to score writing exams

Our AI writing scoring uses a technology called . LSA is a natural language processing technique that can analyze and score writing, based on the meaning behind words – and not just their superficial characteristics. 

Similarly to our speech recognition acoustic models, we first establish a language-specific text recognition model. We feed a large amount of text into the system, and LSA uses artificial intelligence to learn the patterns of how words relate to each other and are used in, for example, the English language. 

Once the language model has been established, we train the engine to score every written item on a test. As in speaking items, we do this by using human expert raters to score the items first, using double marking. They score many hundreds of written responses for each item, and these ‘Standards’ are then used to train the engine. We then validate the trained engine by feeding in many more human-marked items, and check that the machine scores are very highly correlated to the human scores. 

The benchmark is always the expert human scores. If our AI system doesn’t closely match the scores given by human markers, we remove the item, as it is essential to match the standard set by human markers.

AI’s ability to mark multiple traits 

One of the challenges human markers face in scoring speaking and written items is assessing many traits on a single item. For example, when assessing and scoring speaking, they may need to give separate scores for content, fluency and pronunciation. 

In written responses, markers may need to score a piece of writing for vocabulary, style and grammar. Effectively, they may need to mark every single item at least three times, maybe more. However, once we have trained the AI systems on every trait score in speaking and writing, they can then mark items on any number of traits instantaneously – and without error. 

AI’s lack of bias

A fundamental premise for any test is that no advantage or disadvantage should be given to any candidate. In other words, there should be no positive or negative bias. This can be very difficult to achieve in human-marked speaking and written assessments. In fact, candidates often feel they may have received a different score if someone else had heard them or read their work.

Our AI systems eradicate the issue of bias. This is done by ensuring our speaking and writing AI systems are trained on an extensive range of human accents and writing types. 

We don’t want perfect native-speaking accents or writing styles to train our engines. We use representative non-native samples from across the world. When we initially set up our AI systems for speaking and writing scoring, we trialed our items and trained our engines using millions of student responses. We continue to do this now as new items are developed.

The benefits of AI automated assessment

There is nothing wrong with hand-marking homework tests and exams. In fact, it is essential for teachers to get to know their students and provide personal feedback and advice. However, manually correcting hundreds of tests, daily or weekly, can be repetitive, time-consuming, not always reliable and takes time away from working alongside students in the classroom. The use of AI in formative and summative assessments can increase assessed practice time for students and reduce the marking load for teachers.

Language learning takes time, lots of time to progress to high levels of proficiency. The blended use of AI can:

  • address the increasing importance of formative assessmentto drive personalized learning and diagnostic assessment feedback 

  • allow students to practice and get instant feedback inside and outside of allocated teaching time

  • address the issue of teacher workload

  • create a virtuous combination between humans and machines, taking advantage of what humans do best and what machines do best. 

  • provide fair, fast and unbiased summative assessment scores in high-stakes testing.

We hope this article has answered a few burning questions about how AI is used to assess speaking and writing in our language tests. An interesting quote from Fei-Fei Li, Chief scientist at Google and Stanford Professor describes AI like this:

“I often tell my students not to be misled by the name ‘artificial intelligence’ — there is nothing artificial about it; A.I. is made by humans, intended to behave [like] humans and, ultimately, to impact human lives and human society.”

AI in formative and summative assessments will never replace the role of teachers. AI will support teachers, provide endless opportunities for students to improve, and provide a solution to slow, unreliable and often unfair high-stakes assessments.

Examples of AI assessments in ELT

At app, we have developed a range of assessments using AI technology.

Versant

The Versant tests are a great tool to help establish language proficiency benchmarks in any school, organization or business. They are specifically designed for placement tests to determine the appropriate level for the learner.

PTE Academic

The  is aimed at those who need to prove their level of English for a university place, a job or a visa. It uses AI to score tests and results are available within five days. 

More blogs from app

  • A male teacher stood in front of a class smiling at them

    10 acronyms every ESL teacher should know

    By app Languages
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    As you might have learned, the CASAS Life and Work Test series has been updated to become the (Student Test of English Progress). In last week’s blog, we discussed a few of the reasons for the change, and now it is time to review some key terminology to help you further understand what goes on in the ESL field of Adult Education. This week, we’ll review a list of 10 significant Adult ESL acronyms you will come across throughout your teaching career.

    1) WIOA - Workforce Innovations Opportunity Act

    Passed in 2014, the WIOA was designed to strengthen and improve our public workforce system by helping job seekers access employment, education, training, and support services. It requires states to strategically align their workforce development programs to coordinate the needs of both job seekers and employers.

    2) OCTAE - Office of Career Technical and Adult Education

    The OCTAE administers and coordinates programs related to adult education and literacy, career and technical education, and community colleges.

    3) NRS - National Reporting System for Adult Education

    The NRS is the accountability system for federally funded adult education programs authorized by the WIOA. The NRS includes the WIOA primary performance indicators, which describe adult education students and programs.

    4) EFL - Educational Functioning Levels

    EFL Descriptors for Literacy/English Language Arts are intended to guide both teaching and assessment for adult learners. They are organized into reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language domains. There are 6 NRS EFLs: Level 1) Beginning ESL Literacy, Level 2) Low Beginning ESL, Level 3) High Beginning ESL, Level 4) Low Intermediate ESL, Level 5) High Intermediate ESL, and Level 6) Advanced ESL.

    5) ELPS - English Language Proficiency Standards

    ELPS are standards developed to address the need for educational equity, access and rigor for adult ESOL learners with the goal of preparing students for career/postsecondary education.

    6) CCR - College and Career Readiness Standards for Adult Education

    The CCR reflects the content most relevant to preparing adult students for success in colleges, technical training programs, work, and citizenship in the areas of English language arts/literacy and mathematics.

    7) CASAS - Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Systems

    CASAS provides testing of basic and academic skills for youth and adults and curriculum tools for educators. Tests are approved by the Department of Education and the Department of Labor for native and non-native English speakers to assess reading, listening, speaking, writing, and math skills from the lowest literacy levels to high school exit and transition to postsecondary education, training, and the workforce.

    8) CASAS STEPS - Student Test of English Progress and Success

    NRS-approved assessments for ESL that measure academic vocabulary and higher-order thinking skills contained in the ELPS. Replaced the CASAS Life and Work reading and listening test series.

    9) MSG - Measurable Skill Gain

    MSG is the documented academic, technical, occupational, or other forms of progress toward a credential or employment. Documented progress can be measured by comparing a participant’s initial EFL as determined by a basic skills pre-test with the participant’s EFL as determined by the same basic skills post-test.

    10) IET - Integrated Education & Training

    IET is an education model that combines occupational skills training with adult education services to increase the educational and career advancement of participants. It has three required components - adult education and literacy activities, workforce preparation activities, and workforce training, which must all be provided simultaneously.

    What other acronyms have you come across in the Adult Education field?

    Click here to download a printable version of this cheat sheet to browse our textbook selection, including our CASAS STEPS-aligned FUTURE Series. If your program is not yet using the series, or if you’d like tutorials and tips as a current user, click here. Follow along on and share this post with your fellow teachers and administrators.

  • A female teacher stood around a table with adult students sat around in, they are sat in a library.

    The CASAS Test is now the CASAS STEPS. Why?

    By app Languages
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    As you might have heard, the CASAS Test has been updated and is now the CASAS STEPS (Student Test of English Progress and Success). Some of the changes include fewer yet more rigorous test questions and streamlined reading and listening levels. Although changes can be challenging, our team at app is here to help you navigate them and help your students succeed.

    The changing landscape of adult ESL classrooms

    No one knows more about the drastic changes happening in Adult ESL classrooms than teachers. With emerging trends like blended learning and AI technologies and changes in the legislative and workforce landscapes, classrooms are not the same in 2024 as they were 10 years ago when the CASAS Life and Work 980 Listening Series was released. Let’s look at four reasons why we are getting an updated CASAS assessment.

    Why the CASAS test changed

    1. Changes in the workforce

    First, the CASAS test changed because the workforce has changed. Jobs today require higher thinking and more digital skills than ever before. To succeed in this competitive market, our students need to be exposed to more complex and rigorous materials and evaluated accordingly.

    2. Introduction of IET Programs

    The introduction of IET programs (Integrated Education & Training) has shifted adult education methodology to allow for simultaneous career and language preparation, in which students take ESL/ABE courses at the same time as professional certification courses. Curriculum needs to include academic language skills and specific career-related content such as medical, culinary, or construction vocabulary, preparing students to pass state certification assessments. We need our students to complete ESOL and GED classes more quickly and efficiently than ever, alongside certification programs through technical and career colleges.

    3. Technological advancements

    Additionally, there has been a complete shift in the way we use technology and automation in the classroom. Smart boards, online games, online classes, language apps, and YouTube are just a few examples of the world students have at their disposal in their pockets. Many everyday tasks must be completed digitally, like setting up doctor’s appointments, filing taxes, purchasing groceries, and assessing digital literacy is vital.

    4. New NRS descriptors

    Aside from changes in the classroom and workforce, the OCTAE (Office of Career Technical and Adult Education has transitioned to a new set of NRS (National Reporting System) descriptors, and the CASAS assessment needed to be updated to match that transition. We will cover those changes in more detail in the coming weeks.

    Supporting the transition

    Our instructional team has been working hard to ease the transition for you. All our FUTURE Series materials are already aligned with the new CASAS STEPS. If your program is not yet using the series, or if you would like the tutorials and tips as a current user, Discover more about CASAS STEPS preparation here. If you're keen on incorporating FUTURE in your institution, get in touch with us. Stay tuned for .

  • A smiley woman and one of her friends/students working in a cafe.

    English Teacher Awards 2024: Understanding the categories

    By Thomas Gardner
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Teachers shape every aspect of our learning experience, especially when it comes to language learning. Great teachers give learners not only the skills but the confidence to go out in the world, start speaking up and discovering new opportunities.

    We’re celebrating those exceptional educators with the app English Teacher Awards 2024.

    With five different categories and a Gold, Silver and Bronze winner in each, there are 15 chances to take home thousands of pounds worth of top prizes for the winning teachers and their schools.

    Find out more about who can enter and the different categories in this article.