Build success beyond the classroom: Critical thinking and assessment

Christina Cavage
A group of children stood at a table with their teacher watching her write something down on paper
Reading time: 4 minutes

There are some common myths related to critical thinking and assessment. Many people believe that it’s impossible to assess critical thinking, especially in classes where language is limited. However, it can be done! Here, the key to success is crafting tasks and rubrics that allow you to separate language skills and cognitive skills. After all, a low language level doesn’t necessarily reflect your student’s ability to think critically.

So, how can we measure how a student knows rather than just what they know?

How to measure critical thinking

Well, we first have to consider two types of assessment—formal and informal. Formal assessments tend to happen at the end of a task, lesson or skill-building activity and usually focus on the work the student has produced. Then, we have informal assessments. Those are the assessments that involve on-the-spot interactions. These types of assessments play a crucial role in measuring critical thinking.

Tips for teaching and assessing critical thinking
Play
Privacy and cookies

By watching, you agree app can share your viewership data for marketing and analytics for one year, revocable by deleting your cookies.

Formal assessment

There is a common misconception that assessment should only focus on the final work that your students produce. The final ‘product’ is undeniably important and often an ideal measure of linguistic abilities. But the process of producing the final work is where you can see your students’ critical thinking skills in action.

When designing rubrics to measure both language and critical thinking, make sure that you only focus on one at a time—either language or critical thinking. Keeping these different skills in mind will help you to differentiate language skills and critical thinking skills, and evaluate them separately, when it comes to formal assessment.

When measuring language skills, use Bloom’s early or foundational cognitive domains as a model:

If we measure these items, we are really measuring language skills. For example, with a reading activity, we might ask the following questions:

  • Who is the story about?
  • Where does the story take place?
  • What is the main idea of the story?

Can they understand the overall organization and the key vocabulary? These types of questions assess a student’s linguistic ability.

Then, when it comes to critical thinking, the more advanced levels of Bloom’s cognitive domains provide a useful guide:

These types of questions assess a student’s metacognition or critical thinking:

  • Which character is most important to the story?
  • Why?
  • Do you agree or disagree with the character’s actions?
  • Why or why not?

The clear separation of language and critical thinking in assessment will help you to get a measure of each student’s progress in both skills.

Informal assessment

What about those informal assessments? It can be harder to delineate critical thinking and language skills clearly in an on-the-spot assessment.

For example, if you’ve assigned group work, consider keeping a checklist of how students interact with one another. Some checklist items can be:

  • Who made an inference?
  • Who supplied reasoning for another student’s idea?
  • Who made a comparison?
  • Who drew a conclusion?

You can also ask your students to keep a checklist and post these questions on an electronic bulletin board. Like self-assessment, these peer-to-peer assessments can get students reflecting and noticing.

Rubrics can also be useful in informal assessment. Let’s say you’ve asked students to prepare or write an essay. To measure critical thinking, you can look at each student’s ideation process when they’ve been working on their essays:

  • Is a student looking at all possible topics?
  • What are the factors that make a student select the option they did?
  • Are they demonstrating an awareness of other ideas?

The answers to these questions will tell you whether or not your students are thinking critically.

Just like with any other skills, the assessment of critical thinking needs to happen both formally and informally. We need to consider both the process and the final product. And in doing so, we need to carefully design rubrics that differentiate language skills and metacognition.

Read our post 'Success beyond class: Critical thinking skills and academic English' and 'Fostering critical thinking in the classroom'.

Learn about our English courses

More blogs from app

  • A person in a white hoodie sits at a desk, working on a laptop, with bookshelves in the background.

    How to support weaker learners remotely in language classes

    By
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Language teachers know that remote teaching accentuates differences within a class. Students who need more time, repetition and reassurance can feel lost – unless we intentionally design for them. This guide explains how to support weaker learners online, assist struggling students remotely, and help language students who find classes difficult, all without slowing down the rest of the students. Using clear routines, inclusive online teaching and the right tools, you can create virtual classrooms where confidence and progress grow for every learner.

    Start with clarity and differentiation in online language teaching

    Differentiation in online language teaching begins with a precise understanding of all your students' needs.

    • Run brief skill checks at the start of each unit (listening, reading, vocabulary, grammar); a handful of well-targeted items reveals where weaker learners need focus.
    • Map access and conditions. Ask about device type, bandwidth and study environment to plan contingencies for low-tech days.
    • Set one micro-goal per learner per week (for example, “Use three new adjectives to describe a photo.”). Small, specific goals keep momentum.

    Remote teaching strategies for mixed-ability classes

    Mixed ability is the norm online. Structure your lessons to reduce cognitive load and keep every learner engaged; again this helps support struggling learners.

    • Use a predictable flow: Connect (review and warm-up) > Input (listening/reading) > Focus (language noticing) > Practice (guided) > Use (communicative) > Reflect (self-check).

    Offer "must / should / could" pathways:

    • Must secure essential outcomes for all learners
    • Should consolidate skills for those ready to go further
    • Could stretch confident learners without overwhelming others

    Keep tasks short (5–8 minutes) and signal the mode clearly (listen, read, speak, write).

    Scaffolding techniques for online language learning

    Weaker learners thrive on intentional scaffolds that lower barriers and build independence.

    Listening

    • Pre-teach a handful of key words with visuals or quick gestures.
    • Play audio in short chunks with a single purpose each time: gist, detail, then language noticing.
    • Reveal transcripts only after the second listen to confirm understanding, not replace it.

    Reading

    • Set a clear purpose (“Find two reasons the writer gives for…”) before reading.
    • Provide mini glossaries and encourage highlights and margin notes.
    • Model skimming and scanning strategies with a quick think-aloud.

    Speaking

    • Share sentence frames and functional language (“I agree because…”, “Could you clarify…?”).
    • Give rehearsal time with private voice notes before live speaking.
    • Use small groups with roles (timekeeper, summarizer, supporter) and prompt cards.

    Writing

    • Co-construct a model paragraph, then move to guided writing with checklists and word banks.
    • Encourage drafting and redrafting with a single improvement focus (for example, verb endings).

    Online ESL support strategies like these are included in many tasks, making it easier to scaffold without reinventing materials.

    How to engage weaker learners during online lessons

    Engagement is a design choice. Create multiple entry points and safe participation.

    • Offer varied response modes: chat, polls, reactions and voice. Let learners choose their on-ramp.
    • Structure breakout rooms intentionally. Pair confident learners with developing ones, share clear prompts and keep instructions visible.
    • Visit rooms to coach, not catch. Praise specific behaviors (“Nice turn-taking and great use of follow-up questions.”).

    Inclusive teaching online is about psychological safety. Normalize effort and mistakes: “Thanks for trying that structure – let’s polish it together.”

    Ways to motivate struggling students in virtual classrooms

    Students are most motivated when their progress is visible and they receive constructive, concise feedback.

    • Use quick, auto-graded practice for instant wins on accuracy.
    • Keep teacher feedback focused: one or two points per task, delivered as short audio/video notes when possible.
    • Allow resubmission with a success criterion (“Record again aiming for clearer word endings.”).
    • Celebrate micro-achievements publicly (with consent) and privately to build self-belief.

    Tips for supporting mixed-ability groups online

    Build independence with targeted asynchronous supports.

    • Post short screencasts (under five minutes) explaining tricky points.
    • Share downloadable task cards or checklists for low-bandwidth days.
    • Encourage weekly learning logs: What I tried, What worked, What I’ll try next.
    • Use spaced repetition through assignable mobile practice.

    How to adapt language lessons for different levels online

    Planning for multiple levels is easier when you think in layers.

    • Layer input: same topic, different text/audio lengths and complexity.
    • Layer support: word banks, sentence frames and visuals for those who need more; open prompts for advanced learners.
    • Layer outcomes: all learners meet the core objective; confident learners add a twist (for example, an extra opinion or example).

    How to help low-level students in online classes

    • Keep instructions concise and consistent. One slide = one task.
    • Model, then co-construct before independent work.
    • Use strategically: allow brainstorming in the first language, then pivot to English for performance.
    • Provide accessible materials: readable fonts, captions, transcripts and mobile-friendly tasks.

    Supporting your remote learners is both an art and a system. When you design with clarity, scaffold intentionally, and use the right digital supports, you can support weaker students remotely and online, as well as support struggling learners in language classes with confidence.

  • Teaching with purpose: Why the GSE still works in 2025

    By
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    We live in a world in which change is a constant. While change has always existed, lately it has definitely accelerated. There is an idea in society that we should embrace change and adopt whatever is new, with an underlying assumption – wrong to many – that what is new is always better.one that is often wrong

    In the world of ELT, new materials are developed every year. It is unthinkable for most teachers to be using teaching materials that were published 10 years ago. Some would even claim that anything published before 2020 is already out-dated.

    How does all this impact on the Global Scale of English (GSE) – published over 10 years ago? When it was launched in 2014, it constituted a significant innovation in ELT. The following quotes were provided by ELT experts at the time of launch.

  • Three individuals are engaged in a discussion around a table in a library, surrounded by books, with one person gesturing with their hands.

    Ready to study in the USA? Not all tests are created equal

    By
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    If you’re planning to study in the USA, you’ve probably looked into English proficiency tests for university admissions. And you’ve probably noticed – they’re not all the same.

    • Some are more expensive.
    • Some take weeks to deliver results.
    • Some require you to travel to a test centre.

    The app English Express Test is different.

    What makes the app English Express Test special?

    This online English test is designed for international students who want to move quickly and confidently through the admissions process.

    • Take it from home– No travel needed. The app English Express Test is fully online, so you can complete your exam from anywhere in the world.
    • Get certified results in 48 hours– No long waits. Receive your official English proficiency scores fast, so you can meet university deadlines with ease.
    • Pay less– It’s one of the most affordable English tests for US university applications, helping you save on costs.
    • Accepted by a growing number of US universities– Use your results to apply to top institutions across the United States.
    • Built for momentum, not delays– Designed to help you move forward, not slow you down.

    Why this test matters

    When you’re applying to study in the USA, every day counts. You’re juggling application deadlines, coordinating with universities and planning your next big move. You need an English language test that supports your ambitions, not one that holds you back.

    What makesapp English Express Test different?

    • AI scoring for fairness and consistency– Advanced technology ensures your results are accurate and impartial.
    • Security inbuilt– Take your test with confidence, knowing your identity and results are protected.
    • CEFR and GSE-aligned results– Trusted by universities and colleges, your scores are mapped to international standards for English proficiency.

    It’s everything you need for your US university application, without the stress.

    Ready to take the test?

    If you’re searching for an English proficiency test that fits into your life and helps you move forward, the app English Express Test is ready when you are. Take your test today and start your journey to studying in the USA with confidence.