The ultimate guide to English tests for business: Everything HR professionals need to know

Samantha Ball
A group of business people sat on a sofa together
Reading time: 8 minutes

No matter what industry you work in, effective communication is key. For many companies, this means ensuring their employees have strong English language skills. As an HR professional, you have the power to play a pivotal role in this process. English tests can be invaluable tools for improving hiring processes, assessing communication skills, and enhancing overall team productivity. This guide will provide you with everything you need to know about using English tests in your business.

For more guidance on hiring with confidence, also take a look at our simpleguide to language skill assessment.

Part 1: Understanding English tests

Types of business English tests commonly used in business

When it comes to English tests, there are several types commonly used in the corporate world:

  • General proficiency tests: These assess overall English skills, including reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Examples include the TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication), PTE (app Test of English) and IELTS (International English Language Testing System).
  • Business English tests: These focus specifically on business-related language skills. Versant by app and the BEC (Business English Certificate) are some main examples.
  • Skills-specific tests: These assessments evaluate specific skills, such as writing or speaking, in a business setting. Proficiency in English vocabulary is particularly important in these tests, especially for business English. It involves understanding and using business-specific terminology effectively and measures proficiency across listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills on the GSE or CEFR scale.

How these tests are designed and scored

English tests are usually created by language experts and psychometricians to ensure their reliability and validity. These tests include different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, essays, and spoken responses. Objective questions can be scored by a computer, while essays and spoken responses are typically graded by trained examiners.

Differences between various English proficiency tests

Each English proficiency test has its unique characteristics. For instance, the TOEIC focuses on everyday workplace language, making it better suited for general office environments. On the other hand, the BEC is tailored for more specific business interactions, such as negotiations and presentations. Versant by app tests offer a distinctive approach to assessing English proficiency with a focus on communication skills that are critical in a business context. Unlike traditional tests, Versant by app assessments assess various aspects of speech, such as pronunciation, fluency, vocabulary, and syntax for a more rounded overview. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right test for your needs.

Get in touch to find out how we can help with your testing solutions

Part 2: Benefits of English tests for businesses

Improving candidate selection processes

English tests play an important role in identifying candidates best qualified for the job, significantly enhancing your hiring process. '' by Randall L. Jones and Bernard Spolsky emphasize the importance of improving candidate selection processes through effective English proficiency tests.

The papers highlight the critical role of assessing speaking, listening, and reading skills to ensure accurate measurement of job-related language abilities. Various methods, such as oral interviews, listening comprehension tests, and contextual reading assessments, are discussed for their validity and effectiveness in evaluating communicative competence. By enhancing these testing techniques, organizations can make more informed and objective hiring decisions, ultimately leading to better job performance and reduced turnover.

Reducing employee turnover

Properly designed selection processes that incorporate English tests can also help in reducing employee turnover. When you assess language skills effectively, you are more likely to hire candidates who fit well with the job requirements and the company culture. (2009) underscores this point. 'Hiring for retention and performance' reveals that thorough selection processes can significantly decrease employee turnover. By employing these comprehensive assessments, businesses can save on the high costs associated with recruitment and training, while fostering a more stable and cohesive workforce.

Enhancing candidate experience and perception

Incorporating English tests into your hiring process not only helps in selecting the right candidates but also contributes to a fair and transparent selection procedure. Applicants often have better experiences and perceptions of the selection process when they feel the testing procedures are just and clear.

According to an analysis by Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004), fair and transparent testing procedures can greatly improve candidate reactions. found that when candidates perceive the selection process as equitable, they are more likely to view the organization positively, regardless of the outcome. This can enhance your company’s reputation and attract high-quality candidates in the future.

Assessing communication skills for specific job roles

Different job roles require different levels of English proficiency. For example, a customer service representative might need strong speaking and listening skills, while a technical writer would need excellent writing abilities. English tests allow you to assess these specific skills, ensuring you hire the best fit for each role.

Enhancing team dynamics and productivity

Language barriers can hinder team collaboration and efficiency. By ensuring all employees have a solid command of English, you can improve communication, reduce misunderstandings, and boost overall productivity.

Part 3: Implementing English tests in the hiring process

Best practices for integrating English tests into recruitment

To effectively integrate English tests into your recruitment process, follow these best practices:

  1. Identify key language skills: Determine which English skills are most important for each job role.
  2. Choose the right test: Select a test that accurately assesses these skills.
  3. Train your team: Ensure your HR team is trained to administer and interpret the tests.
  4. Provide feedback and utilize task management: Offer candidates constructive feedback based on their test results and incorporate task management to streamline the workflow, making the hiring process faster and more efficient.

Additionally, using recruitment tools like Versant by app can significantly simplify the recruitment process, broadening your network of potential candidates and ensuring a more productive, cost-effective, and unbiased hiring process.

Legal and ethical considerations

It's important to be aware of legal and ethical considerations when implementing English tests. Ensure that your tests are fair and non-discriminatory. Provide reasonable accommodations for candidates with disabilities and be transparent about how the test results will be used in the hiring process.

Tools and platforms for administering tests

There are several tools and platforms available for administering English tests. Some popular options include:

  • Online testing platforms: These offer flexibility and convenience. Like Versant by app testing solutions.
  • In-house testing solutions: These can be customized to your specific needs.
  • Third-party providers: Companies like app offer comprehensive testing services.

Video interviewing has become an indispensable tool in the candidate assessment process. Recruiters can conduct both live and pre-recorded interviews, which integrate seamlessly with applicant tracking systems. This technology overcomes geographical and timezone limitations, speeds up the screening process, and leverages AI-powered features for enhanced decision-making.

Conclusion

Incorporating English tests into your hiring process can offer numerous benefits, from improving candidate selection to boosting team productivity. As the market for English assessment in the business sector continues to grow, staying ahead of the curve can give your company a competitive advantage.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to refine your current approach, now is the perfect time to consider integrating English tests into your recruitment strategy. Enhance your recruitment process with English tests and take your business to new heights. Incorporating these assessments is crucial for making informed talent management decisions, especially in evaluating job applicants and identifying qualified candidates for promotion.

For more insights and resources on improving your hiring processes, connect with us today and discover how we can support you on this journey.

Explore Versant by app

Contact us to find out more

Frequently asked questions

More blogs from app

  • A young child sat at a desk in a classroom writing

    Grammar: how to tame the unruly beast

    By Simon Buckland

    “Grammar, which knows how to control even kings”- ѴDZè

    When you think of grammar, “rule” is probably the first word that pops into your mind. Certainly the traditional view of grammar is that it’s about the “rules of language”. Indeed, not so long ago, teaching a language meant just teaching grammatical rules, plus perhaps a few vocabulary lists. However, I’m going to suggest that there’s actually no such thing as a grammatical rule.

    To show you what I mean, let’s take the comparative of adjectives: “bigger”, “smaller”, “more useful”, “more interesting”, etc. We might start with a simple rule: for adjectives with one syllable, add -er, and for adjectives with two or more syllables, use more + adjective.

    But this doesn’t quite work: yes, we say “more useful”, but we also say “cleverer”, and “prettier”. OK then, suppose we modify the rule. Let’s also say that for two-syllable adjectives ending in -y or -er you add -er.

    Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite work either: we do say “cleverer”, but we also say “more sober” and “more proper”. And there are problems with some of the one-syllable adjectives too: we say “more real” and “more whole” rather than “realer” or “wholer”. If we modify the rule to fit these exceptions, it will be half a page long, and anyway, if we keep looking we’ll find yet more exceptions. This happens repeatedly in English grammar. Very often, rules seem so full of exceptions that they’re just not all that helpful.

    And there’s another big problem with the “rule approach”: it doesn’t tell you what the structure is actually used for, even with something as obvious as the comparative of adjectives. You might assume that it’s used for comparing things: “My house is smaller than Mary’s”; “John is more attractive than Stephen”. But look at this: “The harder you work, the more money you make.” Or this: “London is getting more and more crowded.” Both sentences use comparative adjectives, but they’re not directly comparing two things.

    What we’re actually looking at here is not a rule but several overlapping patterns, or paradigms to use the correct technical term:

    1. adjective + -er + than
    2. more + adjective + than
    3. parallel comparative adjectives: the + comparative adjective 1 … the + comparative adjective 2
    4. repeated comparative adjective: adjective + -er + and + adjective + -er/more and more + adjective

    This picture is more accurate, but it looks abstract and technical. It’s a long way from what we actually teach these days and the way we teach it, which tends to be organized around learning objectives and measurable outcomes, such as: “By the end of this lesson (or module) my students should be able to compare their own possessions with someone else’s possessions”. So we’re not teaching our students to memorize a rule or even to manipulate a pattern; we’re teaching them to actually do something in the real world. And, of course, we’re teaching it at a level appropriate for the student’s level.

    So, to come back to grammar, once we’ve established our overall lesson or module objective, here are some of the things we’re going to need to know.

    • What grammatical forms (patterns) can be used to express this objective?
    • Which ones are appropriate for the level of my students? Are there some that they should already know, or should I teach them in this lesson?
    • What do the forms look like in practice? What would be some good examples?

    Existing grammar textbooks generally don’t provide all this information; in particular, they’re very vague about level. Often they don’t even put grammar structures into specific CEFR levels but into a range, e.g. A1/A2 or A2/B1, and none fully integrates grammar with overall learning objectives.

    At app, we’ve set ourselves the goal of addressing these issues by developing a new type of grammar resource for English teachers and learners that:

    • Is based on the Global Scale of English with its precise gradation of developing learner proficiency
    • Is built on the Council of Europe language syllabuses, linking grammar to CEFR level and to language functions
    • Uses international teams of language experts to review the structures and assess their levels

    We include grammar in the GSE Teacher Toolkit, and you can use it to:

    • Search for grammar structures either by GSE or CEFR level
    • Search for grammar structures by keyword or grammatical category/part of speech
    • Find out at which level a given grammar structure should be taught
    • Find out which grammar structures support a given learning objective
    • Find out which learning objectives are related to a given grammar structure
    • Get examples for any given grammar structure
    • Get free teaching materials for many of the grammar structures

    Think of it as an open-access resource for anyone teaching English and designing a curriculum.