There are some common myths related to critical thinking and assessment. Many people believe that it¡¯s impossible to assess critical thinking, especially in classes where language is limited. However, it can be done! Here, the key to success is crafting tasks and rubrics that allow you to separate language skills and cognitive skills. After all, a low language level doesn¡¯t necessarily reflect your student¡¯s ability to think critically.
So, how can we measure how a student knows rather than just what they know?
Well, we first have to consider two types of assessment¡ªformal and informal. Formal assessments tend to happen at the end of a task, lesson or skill-building activity and usually focus on the work the student has produced. Then, we have informal assessments. Those are the assessments that involve on-the-spot interactions. These types of assessments play a crucial role in measuring critical thinking.
Play
There is a common misconception that assessment should only focus on the final work that your students produce. The final ¡®product¡¯ is undeniably important and often an ideal measure of linguistic abilities. But the process of producing the final work is where you can see your students¡¯ critical thinking skills in action.
When designing rubrics to measure both language and critical thinking, make sure that you only focus on one at a time¡ªeither language or critical thinking. Keeping these different skills in mind will help you to differentiate language skills and critical thinking skills, and evaluate them separately, when it comes to formal assessment.
When measuring language skills, use Bloom¡¯s early or foundational cognitive domains as a model:
If we measure these items, we are really measuring language skills. For example, with a reading activity, we might ask the following questions:
Can they understand the overall organization and the key vocabulary? These types of questions assess a student¡¯s linguistic ability.
Then, when it comes to critical thinking, the more advanced levels of Bloom¡¯s cognitive domains provide a useful guide:
These types of questions assess a student¡¯s metacognition or critical thinking:
The clear separation of language and critical thinking in assessment will help you to get a measure of each student¡¯s progress in both skills.
What about those informal assessments? It can be harder to delineate critical thinking and language skills clearly in an on-the-spot assessment.
For example, if you¡¯ve assigned group work, consider keeping a checklist of how students interact with one another. Some checklist items can be:
You can also ask your students to keep a checklist and post these questions on an electronic bulletin board. Like self-assessment, these peer-to-peer assessments can get students reflecting and noticing.
Rubrics can also be useful in informal assessment. Let¡¯s say you¡¯ve asked students to prepare or write an essay. To measure critical thinking, you can look at each student¡¯s ideation process when they¡¯ve been working on their essays:
The answers to these questions will tell you whether or not your students are thinking critically.
Just like with any other skills, the assessment of critical thinking needs to happen both formally and informally. We need to consider both the process and the final product. And in doing so, we need to carefully design rubrics that differentiate language skills and metacognition.
It's incredible to know that there are thousands of languages spoken across the world, each with its unique set of challenges for learners. A question that often pops up is: "Which language is the hardest to learn?". Today we take a closer look at this question and consider different factors that make learning a language challenging.
Preparing students for the modern world of work can be challenging; it's constantly adapting and changing which can be hard to keep track of. Today's post is a Q&A on the teaching of employability skills and the essential skills and qualities students need to thrive in the 21st century. offers insights to answer common questions and help you improve your language teaching skills.
My advice is to push the issue back to the students by putting them in groups and asking each group to identify a different job/career that involves people working with others. Then ask "What would happen if this job was competitive?instead of collaborative?" You may have to re-explain the concepts, but let students write a little story about a situation in which the workers suddenly all turn competitive.
For example, It was chaos in the women's soccer/football game. All the members of the blue team suddenly became competitive. Each one still wanted to win, but each decided that she would shoot a ball into the other team's net. This included the goalie, who ran up to the front of the field and purposely shoved and tripped members of her team ¡.
Or for more traditional jobs, In the middle of the operation the nurse pushed the doctor out of the way and picked up the instrument. The patient also wasn¡¯t completely asleep, and he tried to do the operation himself, then ¡
It's all absurd, of course, but it can lead into other tasks asking students why collaboration is so important in each job. Then, turning it back to language, what kinds of language does each profession require to collaborate? For soccer/football players, this includes shouted requests and commands:?Pass the ball to me! Shoot!?as well as hand and body gestures. Similarly, doctors require professional jargon:?Pass me the scalpel, please.?Rather than?Give me the pointy knife thing!
One hundred years ago, in 1923, Thomas Edison predicted that motion pictures would replace teachers and books. Since then, similar predictions have been made for radio, TV and computers. It hasn't happened, and one of the reasons is that we crave the human touch in our teaching and learning. I recently read. "When it comes to getting knowledge to stick, there may be no substitute for human relationships. ¡ I've been to former students' weddings and baby showers and funerals of their parents," says Millard, the high school English teacher in Michigan. "I've hugged my students. I've high-fived my students. I've cried with my students. A computer will never do that. Ever, ever.¡±(Waxman, 2023, para. 21-22)
But, that doesn¡¯t mean teachers should stop learning about new technologies. We need to keep finding ways for them to help us and our language learners in the classroom. It can seem overwhelming, though, which is why I recommend shifting responsibility to students: ¡°Do any of you know about ChatGPT? Yes? How do you think you could use it to help you learn?¡± ??? ?
Although the world is in many ways competitive, there are countless examples of how students will do better by collaborating. Most of our students today won't be working in environments where they are competing against their co-workers. Instead, they'll be in teams and need critical thinking and negotiation skills to help them do so.
One way forward is to ensure that your classroom features more collaborative activities. Get students working in pairs and groups on all their assignments, but also create a buddy system so students always have someone else to ask for help. For example, if they're having to read a text and come across difficulties, it's often easier for them to text or call a friend than to wait until the next class. After a few collaborative activities, discuss collaboration versus competition with students and ask them which they prefer. Also, ask them for examples of what their friends and family members do regarding collaborating and competing.
As always, it's better to lead students to understand a new idea than to tell them.
If you want to learn more, make sure to check out Ken's webinar here. If you'd like to learn more about teaching future skills to students check out?21st-century skills and the English language classroom.
Ehsan Gorji is an Iranian teacher, teacher trainer and teacher educator. He also designs strategic plans, devises study syllabuses, runs quality-check observations, and develops materials and tests for different language institutes and schools in the country. Ehsan has been a GSE Thought Leader and Expert Rater since 2016.?
Reflective teaching, despite it sounding modern and sophisticated, has not yet become a common practice among English language teachers. However, the experiential??proposed by??offers a practical approach for teachers. The cycle involves teaching a lesson, reflecting on "what we did" and "how we did them," and then using that reflection to improve future English classes. By using this approach, teachers can prepare for better teaching in the long term.
